OnLive doesn’t do enough to convince us that cloud gaming is ready to be the next big thing, but the fact that it works as well as it does is undoubtedly a major technological achievement. The company has set the standard for “first gen” performance in this field, and it’s now down to others to enter the market and compete. And that’s exactly what upstart rival Gaikai has done – with intriguing results. Although based on similar principles, the implementation is very different. OnLive launched with a full games service, while Gaikai specialises in offering playable demos with plans to expand beyond that when the time is right. OnLive uses widely spaced datacentres to address a large area, whereas Gaikai offers more servers closer to players. The technology behind the video compression is also very different, with OnLive using hardware encoders while Gaikai uses the x264 software running on powerful Intel CPUs. Gaikai reckons its approach results in more responsive gameplay, better base visuals and superior video compression. So how can this be tested? Right now there are only two titles available on both OnLive and Gaikai: Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood and Orcs Must Die, so we’ll be using these two… Read full this story
- Ceramic Tile Vs Porcelain
- Where are We Going: .NET vs Java?
- Face-To-Face Vs. Phone Sales: A Case Study
- Childhood Vaccinations vs Autism - A Parent's Dilemma
- USB 2.0 Vs. Firewire is Like Despotism Vs. The American Way
- Natural Health - Waiting to Ex-Foliate - Home-Spa Vs Go-Spa
- 7 Buy Vs Build Considerations For it Managers
- Coaching Vs Therapy - Bridging The Gap
- Home Equity Loan vs Refinance - The Pros and Cons
- Components of a Data Warehouse Architecture - Part 4, Kimball vs Inmon
Face-Off: Gaikai vs. OnLive have 282 words, post on www.eurogamer.net at March 24, 2012. This is cached page on Sport Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.